To address housing relocation after reaching the designated service life, property managers must first conduct a structural and compliance assessment to ensure adherence to safety and zoning standards. Next, a cost-benefit analysis comparing rehabilitation, modular replacement, or partnerships with private developers should be performed. The optimal solution often involves modular units or public-private partnerships to balance upfront costs with long-term savings.

The primary challenge lies in extending service life cost-effectively while meeting regulatory requirements. According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), public housing structures typically have a 50-year service life, after which rehabilitation or replacement becomes mandatory. A 2020 HUD study found that extending service life by 20-30 years through targeted upgrades can save 15-25% in lifetime costs compared to rebuilding from scratch. For example, modular housing solutions, which are 20-30% cheaper to construct than traditional methods (National Association of Home Builders, 2021), offer a viable alternative. Additionally, public-private partnerships reduce upfront capital expenditures by 10-15% while maintaining compliance with theAffordable Housing Act of 1990. Data from the Urban Institute (2022) reveals that cities using modular housing for relocation post-service life saw a 40% reduction in displacement-related legal disputes, underscoring its effectiveness. However, local zoning laws and funding availability remain critical barriers, as 35% of U.S. counties lack sufficient budget for post-service life housing transitions (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023). This necessitates federal grants or tax incentives to incentivize infrastructure modernization. Ultimately, combining modular construction with regulatory flexibility ensures sustainable housing solutions without compromising community stability.