To effectively review construction drawings, first verify alignment with project specifications, local building codes, and regulatory standards. Second, check for design clashes between disciplines (e.g., structural, mechanical, electrical). Third, ensure clarity in annotations, dimensions, and material specifications. Finally, coordinate with stakeholders to confirm all revisions are documented and approved.

Construction drawings are critical for minimizing errors and delays. A 2022 study by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) found that 20% of construction disputes arise from misinterpreted drawings, costing projects an average of $500,000 in rework. Compliance with codes is equally vital; the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) reports that 15% of construction fatalities in 2021 involved code violations directly linked to flawed drawings. Clashes between disciplines often lead to costly rework, with the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) estimating such issues increase project budgets by 5–10%. Clear documentation reduces revision cycles, as noted in a 2023 PMI report, which found 30% of delays stem from ambiguous drawings. Proactive reviews save time and resources, ensuring alignment between design intent and execution. For example, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) attributes 40% of its project success to rigorous pre-construction drawing reviews, avoiding $200 million annually in potential overruns. These data underscore the necessity of systematic, code-focused reviews to mitigate risks and enhance project outcomes.