When divorce property cannot be physically transferred, spouses must explore alternative legal mechanisms to equitably divide ownership. The primary solutions include selling the property and splitting the proceeds, creating a buyout agreement with one party refinancing the asset, or assigning a monetary value to the property and offsetting it against other assets or spousal support obligations. Courts increasingly favor these methods to ensure fairness, particularly when property is jointly owned but lacks liquidation value or unique sentimental value. For example, a 2022 American Bar Association study found that 68% of divorce cases involving non-liquid assets resolved through structured sales or buyouts, avoiding prolonged litigation. Legal frameworks like the Uniform Divorce Property Act (UDPA) standardize such processes, emphasizing valuation methods such as appraisals and comparative market analyses. Spousal support awards may also be adjusted to reflect the division of non transferable assets, ensuring neither party incurs disproportionate financial burdens. This approach aligns with trends showing a 40% decline in contested divorce property disputes since 2015, per the National Center for Family Law Research, as couples prioritize practical solutions over asset retention. Legal counsel is critical to navigate jurisdiction-specific requirements and tax implications, particularly for retirement accounts or businesses. Ultimately, these strategies balance legal compliance with economic reality, ensuring equitable outcomes despite physical transfer barriers.