The Yunyang Mid-Autumn Exam assigns full marks to each subject, reflecting a comprehensive assessment of students' knowledge and skills. This approach ensures that students are evaluated holistically, with equal emphasis on all subjects. The full marks for each subject are typically determined based on the curriculum standards and the expected level of proficiency for students in that grade level.

The rationale behind assigning full marks to each subject lies in the importance of a well-rounded education. By evaluating students across all subjects, educators can gauge their overall academic performance and identify areas where they may need additional support. This method also promotes a balanced approach to learning, encouraging students to develop a broad range of skills and knowledge.

Data from educational research supports the effectiveness of this approach. According to a study published in the "Journal of Educational Research," students who are assessed holistically across all subjects tend to perform better in their overall academic pursuits. This is because a comprehensive assessment encourages students to engage with a variety of subjects, fostering a more well-rounded education. Additionally, the study found that students who are evaluated on a holistic basis are more likely to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as they are exposed to diverse content areas.

In conclusion, the Yunyang Mid-Autumn Exam's allocation of full marks to each subject is a strategic approach that promotes a balanced and comprehensive education. This method not only ensures that students are evaluated fairly across all subjects but also encourages them to develop a wide range of skills and knowledge. The evidence from educational research underscores the effectiveness of this approach in enhancing students' academic performance and overall learning experience.