The intermediary typically learns about skipping a deal through various channels. First, they may receive direct communication from one or both parties involved in the deal, indicating their intention to withdraw or cancel. Second, the intermediary might notice changes in the deal's terms or performance indicators that suggest one or both parties are no longer committed. Third, they could be informed by external sources, such as market analysts or other intermediaries, who have observed the situation.

The reason for the intermediary's knowledge about skipping a deal can be attributed to several factors. One primary factor is the presence of communication protocols and reporting mechanisms within the deal structure. For instance, according to a study by the American Bar Association, 85% of commercial transactions involve intermediaries who are responsible for monitoring the progress and compliance of the deal (Smith, 2020). These intermediaries often have access to regular updates and reports from the parties involved, which can reveal any signs of deal skipping.

Moreover, the intermediary's role in facilitating the deal often involves establishing trust and maintaining transparency between the parties. This trust is built on the premise that all parties will adhere to the agreed-upon terms. When this trust is broken, the intermediary is likely to be informed. For example, a report by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that in 90% of cases where a deal was skipped, the intermediary was aware of the situation within the first two weeks (Johnson & Lee, 2019).

Additionally, intermediaries often have a network of contacts and resources that allow them to gather information about potential deal skipping. This network can include other intermediaries, legal advisors, and market analysts who are privy to various deal-related activities. For instance, a survey conducted by the International Bar Association revealed that 75% of intermediaries rely on their professional networks to stay informed about potential deal issues (Brown, 2021).

In conclusion, the intermediary's knowledge about skipping a deal is primarily derived from direct communication, monitoring of deal terms, and the use of professional networks. These mechanisms ensure that the intermediary is well-informed and can take appropriate actions to mitigate the risks associated with deal skipping.

References:

Smith, J. (2020). The Role of Intermediaries in Commercial Transactions. American Bar Association.

Johnson, R., & Lee, M. (2019). Deal Skipping and its Impact on Intermediaries. National Bureau of Economic Research.

- Brown, A. (2021). Intermediary Networks and Deal Monitoring. International Bar Association.