In the debate of which wood is better for tables, Elm wood generally surpasses Pine due to its durability, strength, and aesthetic appeal. Elm trees are known for their dense, heavy wood that can withstand the test of time, making them an excellent choice for furniture that requires longevity. Pine, while more affordable and easier to work with, may not be as resilient or visually appealing as Elm over the long term.

Elm wood is harder and denser than Pine, which means it is less prone to dents, scratches, and warping. This durability is crucial for tables that are subjected to daily wear and tear. According to the Wood Database, Elm has a Janka hardness rating of 1,450 lbf (pounds-force), which is significantly higher than Pine's rating of 870 lbf. This higher hardness rating translates to better resistance to wear and tear, making Elm tables more suitable for high-traffic areas.

Additionally, Elm wood has a rich, warm grain pattern that can enhance the visual appeal of a table. Its straight grain and subtle color variations add a timeless quality to furniture, making Elm tables a popular choice for both traditional and contemporary designs. Pine, on the other hand, has a more open grain and a lighter color, which may not offer the same level of visual interest or durability.

From a sustainability perspective, Elm trees are also a better choice. Pine is a softwood that grows quickly and is often harvested from younger trees, which can lead to deforestation and environmental degradation. Elm trees, while slower-growing, are more sustainable and can be harvested from older, more mature trees without causing significant harm to the ecosystem.

In conclusion, Elm wood is the superior choice for tables due to its superior durability, strength, and aesthetic appeal. While Pine may be more affordable and easier to work with, Elm offers a longer lifespan and a more visually appealing finish, making it the better investment for a quality piece of furniture.